Takao Suzuki vs Ben Mclachlan Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W W L L
Form
W W W L L L W L L LH2H: Suzuki 1 - 0 Mclachlan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Suzuki winning 2 and Mclachlan winning 1. The last match between Suzuki and Mclachlan was at the Guam F1, 25-05-2015, Second, Hard with Takao Suzuki getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Takao Suzuki | 1 |
| Ben Mclachlan | 0 |
Guam F1(25-05-2015)
2
6
6
3
6
2
| Suzuki | Stats | Mclachlan |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 128 | Highest Rank | 729 |
| 48 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (353-275) | Career Total W/L | 46% (59-68) |
| $54,465 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Takao Suzuki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Yuki Matsuo
Player
Takao Suzuki
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hiroyasu Ehara
Player
Takao Suzuki
69%
(
79 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
11
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
11 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
48 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Takao Suzuki
Player
Yuichi Ito
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Takao Suzuki
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Takao Suzuki
Player
Ken Onoda
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Takao Suzuki
Player
Issei Okamura
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yusuke Watanuki
Player
Takao Suzuki
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Takao Suzuki
Player
Issei Okamura
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Ben Mclachlan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zihao Xia
Player
Ben Mclachlan
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roberto Marcora
Player
Ben Mclachlan
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Ben Mclachlan
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
97%
(
29 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
5%
(
2 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ben Mclachlan
Player
Max Purcell
88%
(
51 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
18
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Ben Mclachlan
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ben Mclachlan
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Ben Mclachlan
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Mclachlan
Player
Shahar Elbaz
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Mclachlan
Player
Bar Tzuf Botzer
70%
(
88 of
125)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
47 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (353/275) | Win/Loss | 46% (59/68) |
| 55% (816/659) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (138/145) |
| 51% (7243/6830) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1329/1283) |
| 59% (238/165) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (36/44) |
| 39% (22/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (12/15) |
| 59% (73/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (11/6) |
| 44% (20/25) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 387 | Aces Total | 176 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 199 | Total Double Faults | 74 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 500.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 523.8 |
| 65% (3664/5599) | 1st Serve % | 70% (1467/2094) |
| 70% (2538/3642) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (965/1467) |
| 51% (981/1921) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (301/627) |
| 37% (177/476) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (54/138) |
| 36% (1952/5487) | Return Points Win % | 33% (624/1914) |
| 48% (27/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (24/12) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (39/51) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (218/146) | Challenger W/L | 25% (3/9) |
| 56% (43/34) | Futures W/L | 50% (56/57) |
| 58% (327/567) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (59/127) |
| 52% (23/44) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (135/233) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (16/34) |
| 60% (104/174) | Deciding Set Win % | 31% (9/29) |
| 88% (339/297) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (68/55) |
| 11% (339/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (68/13) |
| 21% (289/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (59/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
